How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

A Trinity was first mentioned as G-d, His Word and His Wisdom, by Theophilus of Antioch.

But if you read it through the filter of the traditions of a Trinity, you will miss it (like many miss Jesus telling Mary about Mary’s G-d being Jesus’s G-d). That is incoherent.

Nuda scriptura is scripture alone. Sola scriptura looks at the writings and the traditions, with the writings (source of the traditions) having greater relevance.

The Labour Party wants to put the Winter fuel allowance and the £800,000 of gifts received by ministers behind us. Is this a real option for the people who will suffer as our new masters unapologeticly feast on freebies?

John 20:17] Jesus said to her, “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.’ ”

But it was not until the efforts to create a uniform Christianity at Nicaea that the concept became the accepted tradition, to create a universal (catholic) interpretation of the writings.

Later, Tertullian would lay the foundations of the Trinity.

What kind of pleasure do gay men get from being bottom? The idea is very appealing to me but in practice it's quite painful.

The New Testament identifies Jesus. Literally, spelling it out in Acts 3.

For example, Jesus has a God …

Considering that the traditions stem from interpretations based off the writings, sola scriptura would be the means to test the coherency of the traditions.

Why are most people broke?

So, how does that affect the Athanasian Christian doctrine of the Trinity?